On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 12:35 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Nearly all the other upgrade path problems were not in bugzilla when I had > > a look yesterday. A big bunch now is in the FE7Target tracker, at least. > > Several I've fixed myself, but ACLs block access to other packages. I'm > > disappointed that FESCo (with 'E' as in Extras) in no longer involved in > > trying to reduce crap in the distribution, not even with a roll call. > > I don't mind the AWOL process, which I've tried with one maintainer I'm > > unable to reach for several weeks. But we're at test3. Time is getting > > short if we still want to offer something that doesn't bear too much of a > > risk of confronting users with broken deps and non-working components -- > > especially after Eric Raymonds complaints about [albeit house-made] > > dependency problems in Fedora-land. > > Yeah, you have some point here. Yes, he very much does. I'll add a "Broken Upgrade Paths" topic to the schedule. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
