Re: Secondary ARCH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham wrote:
Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
I think this is a good start. I'm a little concerned with how we ensure that what they put up as "Fedora" stuff is actually Fedora stuff, generated legally, securely, etc... We haven't really had to think on this before because we only put up what we generate, now we're going to put up what somebody else generates from a different system. Just something that will keep me up at night.
I'd say the same way we do it now, bugzilla. (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224627) for example. We have ultimate control to remove something if we need to.

I think what he's asking is do we have the resources to *review* that
stuff is built from the same/similar sources, etc.

Bill

I hate to even suggest this but do we need some sort of super CLA? or would the CLA cover this already? Side note: I'm not sure we can host this immediately, we just don't have the storage right this minute. I'm looking around though.

   -Mike

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux