Re: Secondary ARCH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> >I think this is a good start.  I'm a little concerned with how we ensure 
> >that what they put up as "Fedora" stuff is actually Fedora stuff, 
> >generated legally, securely, etc...  We haven't really had to think on 
> >this before because we only put up what we generate, now we're going to 
> >put up what somebody else generates from a different system.  Just 
> >something that will keep me up at night.
>
> I'd say the same way we do it now, bugzilla.  
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224627) for 
> example.  We have ultimate control to remove something if we need to.

I think what he's asking is do we have the resources to *review* that
stuff is built from the same/similar sources, etc.

Bill

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux