Karsten Wade wrote:
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 02:14 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
You miss the point completely. In short we dont expect ambassadors to be
highly technical people. Making all of them sign the CLA is currently a
high barrier to entry.
There is no big technical difficulty in signing the CLA. It is not that
high of a barrier.
When people balk at accomplishing a minor technical task to gain entry,
it makes me wonder. I personally consider that being able to obtain and
use a GPG key *should* be a requirement for anyone representing Fedora.
If they are stopped from participating by that ... well, disappointing,
but, oh, well. Anyway, that's just MHO and does not represent the
direction I am backing for Fedora.
Depends on the context. If it's for maintaining a package, it is just
part of the process. The maintainer has to deal with much more
complicated things than a gpg signature during the course anyway. For a
ambassadors, it is relatively high. For someone new, editing a wiki for
adding some simple comments or fixing a typo, its way too high to bother.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
