Re: CLA requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:51:53 +0530
sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rahul Sundaram) wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I had the impression that bug triaging doesnt require CLA and
> approved a bunch of folks who have signed for fedorabugs group in the
> account system but then the question was raised on whether a CLA is
> required for that. Do we really need CLA for groups like bug triaging
> and ambassadors majority of whom dont submit any content to the
> project?

As far as fedorabugs, I think it might be good for them to have the CLA
done, since they may be submitting patches, or suggested docs or other
content that might end up shipping in packages and/or web pages. 

Alternately, perhaps bugzilla could do what it was suggested that the
wiki do, namely have something like the wiki's: 
"By hitting Save Changes you put your changes under the WikiLicense. If
you don't want that, hit Cancel to cancel your changes."

ie, 

"By hitting submit you put your changes under the bugzillalicense. If
you don't want that, don't hit submit". 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux