On Wednesday 21 February 2007, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > As far as fedorabugs, I think it might be good for them to have the CLA > done, since they may be submitting patches, or suggested docs or other > content that might end up shipping in packages and/or web pages. > > Alternately, perhaps bugzilla could do what it was suggested that the > wiki do, namely have something like the wiki's: > "By hitting Save Changes you put your changes under the WikiLicense. If > you don't want that, hit Cancel to cancel your changes." > > ie, > > "By hitting submit you put your changes under the bugzillalicense. If > you don't want that, don't hit submit". > I agree, except that we need to point to the CLA as the agreement, rather than a specific license. That applies to the wiki, too. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgp7j9yKgNX9o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
