On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 09:49 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 20:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > [...snip...] > > Jesse Keating, do you want > > to mention Fedora Legacy in this? > > Just to bring out a quick discussion Rahul and I were having on IRC, I'm > not sure we want to include that in this particular announcement. > Although the subject matter is a good fit, right now we don't have the > infrastructure in place to support a resurgence of Legacy. (Let's leave > aside the issue of whether anyone actually wants to *do the work*.) Umm Legacy? Legacy is closed, dead, ka-put. Legacy not working had little to do with the infrastructure. It had mostly to do with no one wanting to do the hard work of security back-porting. Keeping up with the alerts, fixing the pkgs and testing them is difficult, laborious and not-terribly-fun work. That's what made legacy not work. So we should not speak of legacy unless someone has a big pile of money or a big pile of committed, involved and talented folks who will never leave us. :) since we have neither of those... -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
