On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 09:49:15AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 20:06 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > [...snip...] > > Jesse Keating, do you want to mention Fedora Legacy in this? > > Just to bring out a quick discussion Rahul and I were having on IRC, I'm > not sure we want to include that in this particular announcement. > Although the subject matter is a good fit, right now we don't have the > infrastructure in place to support a resurgence of Legacy. (Let's leave > aside the issue of whether anyone actually wants to *do the work*.) I don't think anyone wants to resurrect FL by this announcement, on the contrary we want to show where effectively the efforts of a FL were "merged into". E.g. *instead* of a separate entity caring about security updates we have prolongued the release life span. This should give an example to future Fedora-Legacy like initiatives that it is better to work within the project than as a sibling. It should be a nice and final wrap-up of Fedora Legacy, not a reboot of it. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp2wQlp1Vlyc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
