Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:49:47PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Can we decide if we wanted to extend the lifecycle of FC5 till F7 is > released or not? I know there was some discussions before on that but > since F7 is going to have 4 test releases and second test release is > expected shortly, we need to determine this now. the suggested timelife was 13 months, e.g. the intention was to allow for two releases and 1 extra month, so that people can upgrade from version N to N+1 with a transition time for this skip-an-intermediate- release-jump of one month. Given that schedules can go back and forth like currently for F7, could the policy be reworded to "ETA is one month after the release of the next-to-next subsequent release which usually sums up to 13 months". That way we wouldn't have to adjust the absolute ETA if a release slips. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpynpgUmDRcA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
