Re: kqemu is now GPLv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 01:09 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > As long as every normal person can treat it like ATrpms, I suspect
> > we can be persuaded not to care what you do.
> 
> I wonder if the implicit flame against a supporter of Fedora was really
> neccessary. 

It wasn't a flame; people who use such external repositories don't get
much support. If someone comes to me with a bunch of packages from
somewhere other than Core, Extras and Livna and I suspect that might be
part of their problem then I'm likely to be very disinclined to help.
Is that really a contentious observation?

ATrpms just happened to be the first one which came to mind.

-- 
dwmw2

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux