Re: kqemu is now GPLv2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:09:35PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:05 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > Nevertheless a lot of people want them. I think we should provide
> > a solution for them. I'm willing to maintain a special repo for
> > them, but I'd like to do that (and some other things) under the
> > hood of the Fedora Project.
> 
> We could call it Fedora Flagellation.
> 
> As long as every normal person can treat it like ATrpms, I suspect
> we can be persuaded not to care what you do.

I wonder if the implicit flame against a supporter of Fedora was really
neccessary.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpM5gEcRT0Wj.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux