Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Tuesday 06 February 2007 14:35, Florian La Roche wrote: >> Fabrice did give an ok to package the old kqemu for Fedora, just didn't >> want to see it offered for Red Hat's enterprise offerings. The Fedora rules >> about what licenses we ship as been the barrier for inclusion. > Yes, I know it has, but all external kmods make me want to punch kittens. > That and the craptastic hacks we have to do to support them. Well, yes, they are problematic. But don't do harm to kittens -- it's not their fault ;-) > When we move to the unified tree of packages, I really don't want to hold > kernel updates up for all the extra kmods to be built against it, but if I > don't the repo will not be clean. This will be a serious problem, one of the > reasons I was very very very against allowing external kmods in Fedora. Nevertheless a lot of people want them. I think we should provide a solution for them. I'm willing to maintain a special repo for them, but I'd like to do that (and some other things) under the hood of the Fedora Project. I actually wrote something up about it with more details during my flight to Boston. But I need to look over it before posting it. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
