Re: The QA Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating schrieb:
> On Friday 05 January 2007 10:57, Will Woods wrote:
> One thing that has been suggested before is that each package gets a wiki 
> page, or some other sort of page, that has in formation regarding who 
> maintains it, where is the upstream, Summary/Description all that, and also 
> it could have information about how to use/test that package.
> 
> I certainly think much of this info should be automatically generated out of 
> the package database, and some of it user contributed.  How to get there, I 
> have no idea.

My preferred solution: let some script/tool generate static pages with a
url that does not change, e.g.

fedoraproject.org/packages/foo/

Some informations for those pages could come from the package database,
and some others from the SRPM (maybe a slightly enhanced or modified
version of repoview could do that).

When that scripts runs let it check for the existence of
fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packages/foo
and integrate those parts and/or simply link to that page. The
maintainer or interested users could then maintain some further
informations (important bugs, known problems, ...) in the wiki easily.

Cu
thl

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux