On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 08:05 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 14:41 -0500, Will Woods wrote: > > Problem #1: Testing currently requires a lot of skill, which reduces > > usable manpower. > > > > We lack how-to-test documents, so each tester must know how to set up > > and test any given package/feature on his own. New features don't > > necessarily come with much documentation (e.g. iSCSI). > > > > - Possible solution(s): More docs would lower the barrier to entry. > > Setting up an official Fedora QA group will help keep track of team > > strength and help everyone work together. > > FWIW, the Docs team is willing to help with this part to the extent we > can. Since we don't know your methodology, it's significantly harder to > draft this ourselves. :-) Getting the stuff into maintainable, easily > digestible form and publishing/advertising it, though, we can and should > help do. +1 The size and capability of the Documentation Project has grown a bit recently. A call to arms on a high priority item such as supporting QA documentation efforts is sure to raise some good resources. Otherwise, we have the tools, processes, localization, and editorial help you'll need. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
