Re: The QA Problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Will Woods (wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> So. Does that define The QA Problem? Or are there other issues I'm
> forgetting?

If we're going to support 'always being able to upgrade in the
devel stream to stable, and vice versa', we need to eliminate things
that break upgrades.

This involves:

1) automated post-build testing. Find broken packages before they
   go anywhere. Which means we need to find all the things that
   could break the repository, and write tests for them. 
2) non-automated post-build testing before packages are pushed. Includes:
   - smoke testing
   - %post/%preun/%etc auditing

Presumably more stuff that I'm missing here.

Bill

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux