On Wednesday 03 January 2007 14:52, David Zeuthen wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something or maybe I just don't get it, but how can > rolling back version numbers *instead* of bumping another number (Epoch) > ever be considered a solution? Have we done this before, and if so, what > was the justification? Thanks. Yes, we've rolled back before. I don't have specific examples, but it happens. We've also flat out removed packages introduced during test times. Introducing epochs is ugly and will hang over the package forever, and every effort should be made to avoid it. Because we have the 'right' currently to not worry much about going from T1 to T2 or T2 to T3 or T3 to final, we have a way of preventing epoch. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpnF28SJTlFB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
