On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 14:20 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 14:04, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > And it would be nice (as I said already). But I'd already be glad if we
> > could have the F7TEST3 to F7 way.
>
> Yes, F7T3 to F7 would be nice, but as you said, sometimes we screw up. And if
> we screw up, would you rather we introduce epoch, or roll back the version?
Maybe I'm missing something or maybe I just don't get it, but how can
rolling back version numbers *instead* of bumping another number (Epoch)
ever be considered a solution? Have we done this before, and if so, what
was the justification? Thanks.
David
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
