On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:15:03AM -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Tim Burke wrote: > > >> 5. A Fedora Server spin of F7 > >> Accountable: Jesse Keating (rel-eng), YOUR NAME HERE! > >> > >> Another one of our release targets. Needs defined by Test 2. > >> > > Do you picture a different kernel variant for client vs server? > > I certainly didn't -- but maybe we should consider it. It's not really necessary as most of the things that make a difference can be controlled by sysctls. Most obvious one being the default disk IO elevator. Separate /etc/sysctl.conf's makes a lot more sense than a separate kernel image. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
