On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:54:58PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 10:10:25PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > > > > >> Ingo provides yum-able kernels for some weeks now and it seems to have > > > >> improved testing a lot, which should help getting it fixed and upstream. > > > >> Why not have a highlyexperimental.download.fedoraproject.org > > > >> for stuff like that? > > > > > > > > We could call it fedora-unstable. ;-) > > > > > > > > Seriously. We could. And maybe should. > > > > > > "unstable" in the Debian land is the equivalent of Fedora "rawhide" > > > There is enough confusion as to the differences between Debian testing > > > and Fedora updates-testing. Lets not add more. If it is experimental, > > > let's call it just that. > > > > Confusion is the key word here. Whats the difference between > > "development" and "experimental" ? > > Development = Precursor to general releases. > Experimental = Add on for general releases. No security guarantees. > Might not stay in sync. Staging ground for innovative but very risky > changes. But development also contains bleeding edge packages. Asides from "Add on for general releases", your criteria match what rawhide is today. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
