On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:28:16AM -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Tim Burke wrote: > > > Things like Xen which are a major integration challenge make much more sense > > in Fedora. There are installer, system startup, networking, yada, yada to > > sort out. In contrast, realtime is primarily "just a kernel". So the same > > integration challenges do not exist (knock on wood). There is already an > > existing upstream community around the -rt patchset. Based on this, we may > > not want to fragment the audience. > > > > Mind you, I'm not trying to holdback RT from Fedora. I just don't think its > > mainstreamed enough to fit responsibly. I welcome opinions though. > > There is increasing interest in the Fedora community re: offering multiple > pre-built kernels -- with lots and lots of caveats. Perhaps the RT kernel > is one of these. Whilst Red Hat's medical coverage fully covers "mental health" issues, I'd really rather not proceed down this avenue. We can't support *one* kernel properly. On what planet does it make sense to throw more variants in the mix ? This whole idea stinks of doom so bad. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
