>>>>> "TL" == Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: TL> And BTW, where is the rule in the packaging guidelines and the TL> point in the review guidelines that forbids "Conflicts" or TL> encourages people to avoid them? There isn't one; Conflicts: is a perfectly valid thing to have. It's not really the Packaging committee's business to day whether conflicts are permitted; its up to either FESCo or the core cabal to make that policy. What we could do is pass a guideline that any conflicts should be explicit through a Conflicts: header, and to require specfile comments about the nature of the conflict. I'll raise it for discussion. Of course, this is moot if conflicts simply aren't permitted, but I personally don't think that's reasonable. - J< _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
