Karsten Wade schrieb: > On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 22:24 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Site note: We should create a rough mailing list guideline for Fedora, >> as it is highly confusing that the lists are configured quite >> differently (reply-to munging , Tags in the Subject the two most [only?] >> important things). > I forgot that we had put this up earlier this year, with some recent > refreshing done: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MailinglistGuidelines/ > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MailinglistGuidelines/SubjectLineJunk > > However, dudes like Patrick and me do not have the power to enforce such > guidelines. > > The place to start for the [Subject-line-junk] is actually up at Red Hat > IS. Someone such as Max needs to open a ticket in the helpdesk system > and ask them to do this: Well, we need to agree on something before Max can do that. But it seems nobody/no Sub-project really feels responsible for setting up a proposal and find some people to agree on it. And the board normally should not have to deal with such low-level stuff... > However, there are people who like that [stuff] in their subject, > [...] > As for Reply-to munging. Well, it's evil stuff, but there are equally > smart people on both sides of that debate. [...] Well, to be fair, I don't like to see [stuff] in the subjects and I don't like Reply-to munging. But I could live with them; the different settings on different fedora lists are those that make everything really confusing... CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
