Re: looking at our surrent state a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul W. Frields schrieb:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 14:25 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 15:20 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> On Friday 03 November 2006 15:18, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
>>>> Merge Core and Extras. Really make it so that "Core" is only the
>>>> packages that go on the ISOs, and not anything else, not a special set
>>>> of rules.
>>> Exactly.  And get rid of the term 'core'.  It's far too overloaded anyway.  
>>> Fedora Linux anybody?  (:
>> If we do that, the FSF is going to start asking for Fedora GNU/Linux.
>> Why not just Fedora? :)
> +1.  Internet "journalists" will call it whatever they want anyway. :-)

/me votes for "Fedora Linux" -- Internet and print "journalists" will
often call it just "Fedora" then if our Linux distribution is obviously
 meant. Site note: "Suse Linux" was often simply denoted just as "Suse",
too.

But calling it "Fedora Linux" gives us a chance to do other things like
Fedora Music, Fedora Hurd or Fedora Laris, that all might have nothing
to do with Linux.

CU
thl

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux