Re: looking at our surrent state a bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 14:25 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 15:20 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Friday 03 November 2006 15:18, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> > > Merge Core and Extras. Really make it so that "Core" is only the
> > > packages that go on the ISOs, and not anything else, not a special set
> > > of rules.
> > 
> > Exactly.  And get rid of the term 'core'.  It's far too overloaded anyway.  
> > Fedora Linux anybody?  (:
> 
> If we do that, the FSF is going to start asking for Fedora GNU/Linux.
> 
> Why not just Fedora? :)

+1.  Internet "journalists" will call it whatever they want anyway. :-)

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
       Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
    Fedora Docs Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux