On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 23:23:53 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > As long as the SRPMs remain available. If the respin involves packages > > where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then > > we'd be in trouble. > > > > I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel. I think it > > would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well. > > > > Don't forget CVS. It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS. What is the life-time of the binary files in the Fedora Extras lookaside cache? _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
