On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 15:44 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 02 November 2006 11:32, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > I'd prefer they have their own SRPMS, especially if they had to pull > > anything from -devel (which will get obsoleted from the download > > site soon.) > > > > Now, if they just want one big source ISO, that's fine. > > What about the Fedora project case going forward? A spin of Fedora being of > both Core and Extras packages, user chosen (or in some cases project chosen) > package set. Does EACH spin have to ship the SRPMS used, or can all refer > back to the SRPM pool at fedoraproject.org and its mirrors? If you hose those off of fedoraproject.org (thereby making them official Fedora projects) then the problem would be solved. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
