Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > This has come up on fedora-devel-list. If somebody happens to spin a compose > of Fedora rpms for say ia64, no modifications, no alterations, same exact > binaries that were created at the same time the i386/x86_64/ppc ones were, do > they have an obligation to host all the srpms again where they provide the > spun release, or can they refer back to the mirror system of srpms? I'd prefer they have their own SRPMS, especially if they had to pull anything from -devel (which will get obsoleted from the download site soon.) Now, if they just want one big source ISO, that's fine. Similarly, something like Unity will probably want a source mirror b/c of obsoleted updates. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
