On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 10:15 -0600, Patrick W. Barnes wrote: > On Thursday 02 November 2006 10:03, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > > For that matter, when we allow people to make spins of Fedora comprised of > > their specific package set, do they have to provide the srpms of the > > packages they used? Is it not enough to point to the unified source > > directories on the mirror system? > > IANAL, but my understanding is that they can point back to our sources if > those are the sources they used to build the software. Any modifications or > added software would, of course, need to have the sources provided > separately. Our offers and commitments are sufficient to satisfy licensing > requirements in such cases. See http://software.newsforge.com/software/06/06/23/1728205.shtml for some apparently different opinions from a FSF GPL compliance engineer. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
