On Thursday 02 November 2006 15:50, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > As long as the SRPMs remain available. If the respin involves packages > where we don't keep the RPMS/SRPMS for the life of the ISO respin then > we'd be in trouble. > > I know this would cause trouble for things from FC-devel. I think it > would be a problem for FC-updates and FE as well. > Don't forget CVS. It's just as valid as a source provider as the SRPMS. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpsSeC8oNaDg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
