Re: Metrics: What we *could* get

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:

Yep.

If we're going to bother doing actual engineering work for a measurement solution in FC7, then it should be:

  a. Voluntary;
  b. Anonymous;
  c. Incredibly comprehensive;
  d. Clearly beneficial to users.

And when I say "incredibly comprehensive," I mean that it should collect hardware information and package information, and we should focus on deriving *useful* data from these metrics. Like:

  * What hardware works well, and what doesn't?


See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204518 for my RFE on this.

  * What software packages are widely installed?

http://alioth.debian.org/projects/popcon/

  * What's the reliability of a package, based on a ratio of
    "open bugs" to "instances installed"?

Fix Bug Buddy to work with Red Hat bugzilla. Install it by default and recommend it heavily instead of the web interface for reporting bugs. That should be a big boost in feedback.

We've had these ideas before. RHN collected *most* of this data back in the RHL days, but no one ever made it a priority to mine this data, so it just sat there, useless. Pootypedia, which was intended to do the hardware cataloging, was sponsored by SoC in the summer of '05, and never went anywhere. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/pootypedia/)

Destined to be dead. We should have used HAL instead of Kudzu. Our Google SoC efforts so far with Fedora has nowhere been as useful as it could be. We should focus on smaller well defined projects and specific RFE's instead of picking projects that require ongoing development.



Again, these ideas are not rocket science.  It's basic client-server
stuff, a little bit of XMLRPC, a little bit of Python, a well-maintained
database server.  We just need to decide that these projects are
important, and then we need to set up a team that's responsible for
executing them.

If we were to have a hackfest, this would be, for me, one of the most interesting projects.

Agreed.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux