On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 01:01 +0530, Rahul wrote: > > > > If we allow arbitrary kernels that are maintained in Extras, how do we > > make sure that there's actually a consistent set of features provided? > > We dont need to allow arbitrary kernels. Can we allow Planet CCRMA > kernel or the OLPC kernel? Can we leave OLPC out of this for now? Yay for OLPC, but only a few people have hardware that it could actually be used on. Planet CCRMA is a much more realistic case. > > And that's ignoring the questions of currency and handling of security > > errata, which is already hard enough. > > Yes. A good maintainer would be required. Fortunately, in both these > case we have one. RT patch set is being pushed very heavily upstream by > Ingo and is expected to take a few revisions. Does Ingo want to maintain a kernel _package_ though? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
