Re: Alternative kernels?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 20 September 2006 15:38, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> Frankly, "might"s and "maybe"s aren't really enough here for me.  Having
> a separate kernel doesn't really do anything to enable people to help
> him... so if they're not doing it now, why are they going to be _more_
> willing to do so when we basically say "here, we endorse you having your
> own playground"?
>
> We went down this path for a while with the Xen kernel stuff and the
> amount of pain was way way way huge.

There is also the fun of 'You added the Extras repo, the PlanetCCRMA repo, and 
Joe's repo.  Each repo has a kernel, you've selected them all.  What do you 
boot by default?'

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpWDKEUNpeBC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux