On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 09:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:56:53PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 23:45 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > Once again I think it would be better to deprecate openmotif but drop it > > > only at FC7... > > > > The only way I think this is going to happen is if the license on > > openmotif is changed to something that is OSI or FSF compliant. > > The licence issue is allready solved by migrating to lesstif, it allready > shows the commitment to have only OSI approved licences. As I've told you many times before, I am having VERY STRONG doubts about this claim. To me, your are just plain WRONG and a victim of religious zealotry. If you want to prove and/or counter prove this claim, I'd strongly recommend some RH and/or Fedora leader to formally notice the OpenGroup for having violated their licence - Their reaction will bring clarity. Ralf _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
