On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 10:46 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 09:01 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:56:53PM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 23:45 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > > > > > Once again I think it would be better to deprecate openmotif but drop it > > > > only at FC7... > > > > > > The only way I think this is going to happen is if the license on > > > openmotif is changed to something that is OSI or FSF compliant. > > > > The licence issue is allready solved by migrating to lesstif, it allready > > shows the commitment to have only OSI approved licences. > As I've told you many times before, I am having VERY STRONG doubts about > this claim. I'm only going to say this once, and rise above your childish insults: ANYTHING without an OSI/FSF approved license doesn't go in Fedora. That's the way it has been since day 1. We're correcting an inconsistency in Fedora Core. ~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
