On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > The licence issue is allready solved by migrating to lesstif, it allready > > shows the commitment to have only OSI approved licences. > As I've told you many times before, I am having VERY STRONG doubts about > this claim. To me, your are just plain WRONG and a victim of religious > zealotry. I am not a victim. Fedora is the victim. I personally don't care about openmotif being in fedora or not (after more thinking, I think I would have preferred that openmotif stays in fedora, and that the non conflict rules be relaxed for that case only, to be able to test lesstif in fedora). I care about fedora being consistent with its goals, that's why I helped having lesstif replace openmotif. > If you want to prove and/or counter prove this claim, I'd strongly > recommend some RH and/or Fedora leader to formally notice the OpenGroup > for having violated their licence - Their reaction will bring clarity. It is not a licence violation. It is not in agreement with fedora goals. -- Pat _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
