Bill Nottingham wrote:
Christopher Blizzard (blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
As for the second question, it's just asking if we had licensing
problems with anything in FC that we just pushed to extras instead of
getting rid of it entirely. That status email is vague in that respect.
AFAIK, Extras already follows OSI/FSF licensing, so anything that's not
good enough for Core isn't good enough for Extras either.
Bill
That's good, but it still needs an audit, no? Have the extras folks
been super-vigilant? To be frank, I would have thought that we as a
company would have been equally as vigilant but if there's anything I've
learned it's that we had a lot of crap in our distro.
--Chris
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
