Christopher Blizzard (blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > As for the second question, it's just asking if we had licensing > problems with anything in FC that we just pushed to extras instead of > getting rid of it entirely. That status email is vague in that respect. AFAIK, Extras already follows OSI/FSF licensing, so anything that's not good enough for Core isn't good enough for Extras either. Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
