On 8/29/06, Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 11:58 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > None of the packages altered or dropped from Fedora Core so far meet > > > either the OSI or FSF guidelines. Openmotif and its dependencies in > > > Fedora Core dont. Few others like lha listed in the last audit update > > > mail probably isnt OSI compliant either. > > > > > Senses the new repository fedora-nonfree-but-mostly-distributable coming shape. I don't think Fedora wants to do this (or lend its name to something like this). Either it meets the OSI/FSF guidelines, or it doesn't.
Well the name was a better idea than the fedora-why-the-crap-did-we-ship-this-before which is a temp repository for packages that are being 'demoted' from core+extras until such time as they get fixed.
~spot -- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my! _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
-- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
