Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
We *already* have many packages both in Fedora Core and Fedora Extras
that dont meet the guidelines. If we are going to clean it up, we can do
so in a better manner than just dumping out packages.
What packages do we have that are *neither* OSI or FSF?
None of the packages altered or dropped from Fedora Core so far meet
either the OSI or FSF guidelines. Openmotif and its dependencies in
Fedora Core dont. Few others like lha listed in the last audit update
mail probably isnt OSI compliant either.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-August/msg00076.html
We havent done the analysis in Fedora Extras yet including on all the
packages tagged "distributable".
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
