Non-free repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 11:58 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

> > > None of the packages altered or dropped from Fedora Core so far meet
> > > either the OSI or FSF guidelines. Openmotif and its dependencies in
> > > Fedora Core dont. Few others like lha listed in the last audit update
> > > mail probably isnt OSI compliant either.
> > >
> 
> Senses the new repository fedora-nonfree-but-mostly-distributable coming shape.

I don't think Fedora wants to do this (or lend its name to something
like this). Either it meets the OSI/FSF guidelines, or it doesn't.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux