On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 21:29 +0530, Rahul wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 11:27 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > >> On Sunday 20 August 2006 07:21, Rahul wrote: > >>>> - Disallow kmodule-packages in Extras and only integrate some very > >>>> important modules in the Core kernel package (like the Broadcom-WLAN > >>>> drivers we merged in FC% or ipw2100 and ipw2200 in FC4) > >>> This really seems the better solution to me. It put the kernel > >>> maintainers in control of the situation and they need to be in control > >>> since they are the ones dealing with the bug reports and would be more > >>> aware of which modules are going upstream etc. > >> I'm in favor of this too. Prevents the lag between updates in which a user > >> could be vulnerable to a known kernel flaw, and it keeps our depsolvers and > >> buildsystems somewhat sane. > > > > But why wouldn't they just be part of the actual kernel package then? > > > > They would be. That is in fact the suggestion. Ah, I misread the suggestion. Thanks. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
