On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 14:03 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > I would like a FC7 goal of having at least the spec files patched to > use the same 'terms' in every License: tag. GPL, Gnu Public License > V2, etc makes a job for someone who has to look at these things for a > 'site' harder. I would like to have the terms to be standardized a bit > more to something like: > > License: GPL (see COPYING for complete versions) > License: Various (see LICENSES for versions and files applied) > > etc. That way a person can go see that the license(s) is there, what > file(s) are it in etc. > > Having each packager go through that rigamarole might have them think > : "Hmmm this code turns out to be CDDL/GPL/SCO combined code. Maybe I > should find something else." That's a pretty good idea IMHO. Care to bring it to the Packaging Committee and see if the standardization of the license descriptions can be added to the guidelines? josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
