Re: [Fwd: What is the mkisofs license?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 20:03 +0530, Rahul wrote:
> Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> 
> > 
> >>> Then again, I've yet to see or hear any result from my previous license
> >>> analysis, so I can only assume that Fedora doesn't care to clean up its
> >>> existing egregious violations.
> >>>
> >> I do appreciate the work done and I was assuming that you were following 
> >> up and working on dropping the violating packages.
> > 
> > I'm not able to drop packages in Core, I could start opening bugzilla
> > tickets.
> > 
> 
> Yes. Please do. How about Fedora Extras? I am sure we got to analyze 
> them too.

We don't need to analyze Extras for FSF license compliance, IMHO.

~spot


_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux