Rahul wrote:
Tom Callaway wrote:
We don't need to analyze Extras for FSF license compliance, IMHO.
The packaging guidelines changes if any would affect both the repositories and the distribution on the whole includes both. Not sure why you would consider excluding Fedora Extras.
AFAIK, no one has proposed/sugggested so far that Fedora's packaging guidelines require FSF license compliance (instead of simply opensource.org ) yet.
-- Rex _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
