Re: Re: "community maintainers working on core" dilemma

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Blizzard (blizzard@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >The advantage of using the VCS/bundles rather than patches is when
> >merging.  If <core> has done development on the package since <me>
> >branched their version of the package <core> has more information to
> >merge the changes back in.
> >
> 
> I'm sure that a VCS is part of the solution on how to move forward, to 
> be sure.  But I want to avoid super-specific technology solutions to the 
> problems at hand.  I want to nail down our goals and what the developer 
> experience is before we pick tools or decide to build our own.

I don't know, I'd rather work incrementally - first get Core & Extras
in new-distributed-thing-for-multiple-inside-and-outside-maintainers,
then go down the next-gen magic thing.

Bill

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux