Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Josh Boyer wrote: > >>> There is another reasonable compromise: >>> >>> 1. Come up with a "protected" logo that ships with FCn, and really >>> anywhere we need to emphasize the strong relationship between RH and >>> Fedora. >> Aka, the RH logo, but with a blue hat instead (as an example). >> >>> 2. Apply the aforementioned guidelines to the "protected" logo. >>> 3. "Free" the current logo. >>> 4. Grant broader rights to the "free" logo via a CC license. >> I like this. How does it get pushed to the appropriate people? > > Oh, it has been. Unfortunately, it's been rejected. > Which means that my current efforts are actually a bit like bear-baiting. Or go the other route of keeping the existing logo as-is, and making a new "free" one? -- Rex _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
