On Thursday 13 July 2006 14:42, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > There is another reasonable compromise: > > > > > > 1. Come up with a "protected" logo that ships with FCn, and really > > > anywhere we need to emphasize the strong relationship between RH and > > > Fedora. > > > > Aka, the RH logo, but with a blue hat instead (as an example). > > > > > 2. Apply the aforementioned guidelines to the "protected" logo. > > > 3. "Free" the current logo. > > > 4. Grant broader rights to the "free" logo via a CC license. > > > > I like this. How does it get pushed to the appropriate people? > > Oh, it has been. Unfortunately, it's been rejected. > > Which means that my current efforts are actually a bit like bear-baiting. > > :) > D'oh! Just when you had me convinced... So... where do we stand? Are our hands tied completely? -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgpV9eJOOpFeh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
