On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, seth vidal wrote:
For legal issues, we have had Greg Dek acting as our counsel gateway
for a while now. Considering the number of issues that popup (package
license approvals, patent concerns, logo, trademark & brand guidelines
etc etc), having a single person acting as a gateway might not be the
best approach here and since the primary Red Hat counsel is already in
this list, we might consider sending a mail to this list for addressing
their legal concerns regarding Fedora for issues that can be address in
a public list and let Greg Dek handle anything more sensitive off list.
If we have consensus, lets make this our new policy.
Umm - Is Greg on board with this? :)
In reality, it should s/Greg/Max with regard to Fedora legal issues. And
I'm on board with it.
--Max
--
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
