Max Spevack wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, seth vidal wrote:
For legal issues, we have had Greg Dek acting as our counsel gateway
for a while now. Considering the number of issues that popup (package
license approvals, patent concerns, logo, trademark & brand
guidelines etc etc), having a single person acting as a gateway might
not be the best approach here and since the primary Red Hat counsel
is already in this list, we might consider sending a mail to this
list for addressing their legal concerns regarding Fedora for issues
that can be address in a public list and let Greg Dek handle anything
more sensitive off list. If we have consensus, lets make this our new
policy.
Umm - Is Greg on board with this? :)
In reality, it should s/Greg/Max with regard to Fedora legal issues.
And I'm on board with it.
So would you prefer any legal issues including license approval for
packages in Fedora Extras send to this list or to you directly.
http://fedora.redhat.com/About/contact.html lists Greg Dek as the legal
contact still.
Patrick, can we copy all such pages (leaving out the formally published
documentation under /docs for now) over to the wiki and setup up
redirects? Shouldnt be more than a dozen pages now.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
