On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 12:46 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 07 July 2006 17:48, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Summary: RPM 4.4.6 is available > > > Ugh. We really need to revoke his bugzilla rights and tell him that if he > wants a bug tracking system for his upstream rpm to get one on is own. Red > Hat's bugzilla should be for the rpm we include in our products, not > upstream. I'm tired of him messing with and closing Fedora / RHEL rpm > related bugs with snide upstream comments, that to the casual reader could be > considered coming from a Red Hat source. Enough is enough. > Has any thought been put into this? rpm is a critical piece of the distribution. As bad as it is when a bugzilla report against rpm appears to be ignored, these types of comments and bug closings by someone other than the Fedora/Red Hat maintainer are even worse. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
